Doctor Venkman;139559
That's not what anyone is saying. There are clear differences between the systems that are there to be considered.

Cost, yes, is one of them. Games, and other capabilities (like Bluray), are actually meaningful comparisons to be making.

That was just a little comedy on my behalf, and more of my own philosophy really! sorry!

I'd say 360, it has better online gaming, plus more downloadable content.

A guy I work with just got the E 74 error, after a year of owning his 360. Apparently they're like ticking time-bombs.(*egon)

rockstar232007;139810
A guy I work with just got the E 74 error, after a year of owning his 360. Apparently they're like ticking time-bombs.(*egon)

Microsoft will take care of the E74 under their 3 year warranty.

skankerzero;139815
Microsoft will take care of the E74 under their 3 year warranty.

That's what I told him.(*peter)

This is against nobody here, but has anyone ever go to those other gaming sites? Like IGN or something like that?

Has anyone ever noticed that 90% of the time it is the PS3 fanboys are the ones that start these console war debates? Again nothing against anyone here because this is not really a MAJOR flame war like I have seen. It's just looking at the other kind of threads like that I did notice a pattern.

As Yahtzee has said “People sometimes argue to feel like their product they bought was not a waste of money.”

I think we all can say this here: Both systems are good with their pros and cons. Both systems are reliable enough that if something happens that you can at least have it replaced. Both systems, at this point in time, are at an equal par with each other with maybe the 360 doing a little bit better, but not much.