(*rant) What I'm about to present to you is an article I found in issue 67 of Wizard Magazine. After reading this article it gave me a better understanding of what it's like to be in Chad's shoes. I am not taking sides, I'm just offering a different perspective on things. This article is written by Ron Marz and is about the Green Lantern situation. However if you ignore these references and keep in mind the things Chad has had to deal with in regards to GBN\GBC maybe some of, I hope many of you, will see a different perspective.
" When I was tabbed as the new writer of Green Lantern in 1994, the plan called for getting rid of Hal Jordan as Green Lantern in favor of a younger ring-slinger. This envisoned as something different from the “death” of Superman or the breaking of Batman, this was permanent.
And boy, did we piss off a fair share of old-time readers in the process.
Even though it was a decision originating in DC editorial, it was my name in the credits. And even though I had a fondness for Hal's character, after some inital misgivings, I believed the new direction was the right decision. So I was perfectly willing to stand up and take my share of the expected heat. It was just the intensity of the heat that was unexpected.
I've always regarded change as good, as necessary. Without change, especially in a creative realm, we stagnate. But some fans didn't want to change. Their attachment with to Hal was passionate, to say the least. They took Hal's fate personally, like he was a member of the family. I was surprised at such a volatile reaction to something that…well, wasn't real. Despite the “new” Green Lantern's success, the outcry never quiets in some quarters: bring back Hal, get rid of Marz, fire the editor.
Angering readers isn't necessarily a bad thing. You're pressing the audience's buttons, generating an emotional response because of something you simply made up. That's one of the greatest satisfactions a writer can have. It means you've done your job:you've made people care.
I'd rather be vilified than ignored, but I've never written anything to intentionally anger readers. That's for Green Lantern or any of the other books I've written. The choices I make are dictated by my story sense, my views of what makes good drama and what I think best serves the characters. And yes, sometimes those choices anger fans.
So how do you deal with them? Generally, I and most othe creators don't. This isn't like playing for the Yankees, where fans can voice their displeasure over your latest batting slump because they come to your place of work. There aren't any jeering crowds in my office. Other than infrequent online exchanges and occasional conversation appearances, there's not a great deal of direct fan interaction. Those instances where I have had an exchange with an irate fan, I've had to to explain why I did what I did. And in alot of cases, the explanation falls on deaf ears. Incensed readers don't want an intelligent discussion, they want you to fall on your knees, admit the error of your ways and beg forgiveness. You can't win. And you can't allow yourself to be swayed by what the readers want; you can't prostitute your craft.
Ultimately, what it all means is….nothing. In the larger scheme of things, what I or anybody else in this industry does is diverson. It's entertainment, and with few exceptions, that's all it is. Once in a while, a Dark Knight Returns, or a From Hell, or a Maus is created, and we can all be proud. But first and foremost, comics aspire to give readers a 20 minute ride. Our art form is designed to entertain, and as such, it pales in comparison to real-world concerns. AIDS. Rain forest depletion. The Homeless. Animal cruelty. Pick your cause.
My point here is that those are the things that should anger us or fire our passions, not the “lives” of comic book heros. I don't mean to say comics are meaningless. Everyday I pursue my profession with as much energy and enthusiasm as I can muster. The fans pursue their hobby with a zeal that should flatter those of us lucky enough to be creators. But we shouldn't lose perspective. We shouldn't let comics take the place of the things that matter.
If a book consistently angers or fails to entertain you, you don't have to read it. If you don't like Green Lantern, though I hope you do, there are worse things you can do with the $1.75 than give it to a homeless shelter. If you don't like what Captian America has turned into (get in line), give your $1.95 to a soup kitchen.
Don't lose sight of what's really important."