Bill Murray and Typecasting


by Tobin2027

21 years, 8 months ago


Peter Kong, you are being very greedy. If the only way we can see a GB3 is without Murray, then so be it. All the others would be there at least. Im sure Ackroyd would add a new character to replace Bill. GB3 all the way! Even if it has to be without Bill. Look at T3 again, no Linda Hamilton! OMG Lets Have A COW!

by roshangar

21 years, 8 months ago


For those of you that think Murray is a jerk and hates being associated with Ghostbusters, there was an article I read a while ago that said different. He and Dan Ackroyd visited a sick boy in full gear and spent the day with him. I'll try and find the actual article.

EDIT:

http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Lot/2976/wishes.html

by PeterKong

21 years, 8 months ago


Having a GB movie without Peter Venkman is like having a Happy Days episode without Gabe Kotter. You need th full cast. I wouldn't mind them replacing Bill, but it just wouldn't be the same. It'd be Bewitched all over again. Dick Seargent was decent, but Dick York will always remain to be Darren Stevens. Sorry, I'm usually a purist when it comes to TV shows, movies, and cartoons. It needs to traditional to some extent. Given some things need to be changed for certain reasons, but at least try to stay true to the original source.