ReplicaterZ;135312
I'm addressing Walter Peck here aka Dickless, lol
1. Dont be a judgemental bitch because I dont have time to sit here all day like you, making sure every word is right
Watch the language and the attitude, Jeremy. Attacking him isn't going to do you any favors here.
2. At least I have balls enough to come in here and stand up and face what I did wrong wich wasnt much of nothing, its not like I ripped anyone off, You dont see these other guys coming around do ya…???? Nope….
You may have explained what you did but that isn't exactly standing up and facing the fact you recasted someone's work. If you had, you would've apologised to the community as a whole about selling the recast parts, and apologised to the part maker.
3. Any one who would join a ghostbusters message board and choose the user name of one of the ghostbusters “foe's” cant be right in the head…. Didnt Ray Stants refer to Walter Peck as “”DickLess“”
I beg your pardon? I've seen plenty of people with variations of the spectral nemeses from the films who seemed perfectly alright in the head. You're displaying extremely flawed logic with the idea that because he chose the name “Walter Peck”, he has to be “wrong in the head”.
Speeking of copying off others inventions, I think about every one else here has, if they built theyre own proton pack, Arent you the asshole tryin to get rights from sony to do those proton packs with Master Replicas?…. Jerks like you that have the nerve like you shouldnt be allowed in here to pick, poke and prod, at other members when you dont know a darn thing about them
Hypocrit
And now you appear to be leaping to wild, unproven claims.
The three forum members who recently revealed they were involved with Master Replica's now cancelled Ghostbusters line were Namebrand, Cam and Java. As far as I'm aware Walter here is none of the three.
Furthermore, whilst it could be seen as a double standard to go from criticising MR for wanting to do the props, to agreeing to help them make them… there is a flaw in your logic as to how it could count in any way similar to your own act of recasting.
The majority of the information that would've been used to create the MR props is either already out there in the public domain, or is the collective experience of the prop makers who would've been helping to produce the prototypes… they wouldn't have been taking someone else's product, recasting it and not giving them the credit due, and it is highly egotistical for you to think that the two separate events are even remotely the same.
I'm now issuing you a warning, your attack on Walter is unjustified and cannot be claimed to be a fair defence of yourself. You are to stay away from making a post in this topic. Any further replies made by you will be noted depending on if they repeat the same argumentativeness you've displayed in the post above.