CJ
Never been a problem with me the way you describe the Ghostbusters in detail. Adds just that little extra push of imagination for anyone who stumbles in not really knowing who they look like.
There seem to be two schools of thought on this one…
Mine tends to be this: I wanted to be a comic book writer for a long time (deep down I probably still do…) So that influences my work in two ways. First, comic writers are encouraged to rememeber that “Every issue is somebody's first” And the second is to try to think visually. Well, I don't have an artist to draw what I'm thinking, so I try to “draw” that picture with words.
The counterargument is that I'm basically shouting “These are the cartoon Ghostbusters” and shoving their faces in it. That if you're reading Ghostbusters fan fiction, you already know who the canon characters are and what they look like; and worse, since there are two such drastically different concepts, I'm alienating potential fans who nevertheless prefer to think of the Ghostbusters as Four Guys In Tan Who Look Like Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Harold Ramis, and Ernie Hudson. If I cut out descriptions, I'm more neutral and less divisive.
I'm not going to stop it completely. But I figure that my web site is chock full of pictures that make my preferences quite plain, so I should try harder to not overdo it in the prose.