by
14 years, 10 months ago
by
14 years, 10 months ago
by
14 years, 10 months ago
by
14 years, 10 months ago
by
14 years, 10 months ago
by
14 years, 10 months ago
Doc Fritz;158532
I hate this idea, myself.
For all the talk about how derivative GB2 was (and it was) one thing it did right was have a villian with no connection to Gozer. Now they tried to retcon one in.
The other reason is that it makes Vigo look a lot weaker–now we find out he couldn't even generate his own psychomagnetheric slime? He just had to piggyback his plan off of someone else?
I've come to greater appreciation, the last couple of years, to JMS's decree in the RGB writer's bible to “forget about Gozer. He's history.” I definitely liked it better when every villain didn't have to be Gozer's father, or concubine, or minion, or Scottish redneck cousin.
by
14 years, 10 months ago
by
14 years, 10 months ago
by
14 years, 10 months ago
JamesCGamora
From my remembrance, they never straight-out said that a single event in the game was a connection between Vigo and Gozer. They did however insinuate, via a character who, in all honesty, compared to the others didnt know better but nothing more. Insinuations and hints of this nature can either be accepted or ignored by the fan base or future writers I mean look at Marvel comics. For the longest time it was insinuated that Sabertooth was the father of Wolverine and look how that ended up
by
14 years, 10 months ago
Doc Fritz;158532
The other reason is that it makes Vigo look a lot weaker–now we find out he couldn't even generate his own psychomagnetheric slime? He just had to piggyback his plan off of someone else?