GB3 in IMDB!


by Spanish_GB

18 years, 7 months ago


by Kingpin

18 years, 7 months ago


Sadly yes… just be careful and don't take a IMDb entry as fact…

by marshmallow

18 years, 7 months ago


who knows? maybe it will happen, after all

by marshmallow

18 years, 7 months ago


by drraystanz

18 years, 7 months ago


Damn man…for old news it's getting a hell of a lot of coverage these days. What's worst is the ghostheads that have already heard the news are suffering because it's OLD….sucks man. We eant tit the most and we're bombarded with nothing but recycled news.

by Spanish_GB

18 years, 7 months ago


marshmallow
http://stories.indobase.com/article_6032.shtml
take a look, guys

Sorry, I need a clarify… I dont understand all english words… It say:

BEN STILLER filling in for BILL MURRAY

It's that BILL MURRAY won't be PETER VENKMAN??? :-O

by marshmallow

18 years, 7 months ago


i think it ‘s just a rumour, anyway, I don’t think ben stiller would play peter venkman as he as nothing to do with the character. If there'll be a peter venkman in the movie it won't be bill murray in any case, ‘cause it seems to me now he’s interested in other kinds of movies. The only interesting thing in the article i posted is that the date is may 20….but someone here say it's just old stuff.

by Kingpin

18 years, 7 months ago


marshmallow
http://stories.indobase.com/article_6032.shtml
take a look, guys

AGGGHHH! WHEN WILL IT END?! (*rant)

I mean, really… they're just going Google searches and dredging up any old item with ‘Ghostbusters 3’, ‘Dan Aykroyd’ and ‘Harold Ramis’ in the text body…

Sorry, I need a clarify… I dont understand all english words… It say:

BEN STILLER filling in for BILL MURRAY

It's that BILL MURRAY won't be PETER VENKMAN???

I think it's just bad wording, I don't think they meant to suggest Ben Stiller was replacing Bill Murray as Venkman, but he'd be replacing the Venkman role as Murray doesn't want to commit.


Oh God, now I sound like it's actually coming out…

by marshmallow

18 years, 7 months ago


there's no reson to get angry for this. I never said that what I posted it's true, but i think that continuous rumours are a good thing, 'cause they keep the interest in the movie alive. Everybody knows that sometimes false news come from the producers themselves to check if people are interested in it.

by Kingpin

18 years, 7 months ago


marshmallow
there's no reson to get angry for this. I never said that what I posted it's true, but i think that continuous rumours are a good thing, 'cause they keep the interest in the movie alive. Everybody knows that sometimes false news come from the producers themselves to check if people are interested in it.

Oh hey, don't think I was lashing out at you… I'm lashing out at the extremely gullible and the extremely manipulative, people are just copying and editing the old articles to support this silly rumour.