cince there might be a gb3, why dont make it in 3-D? it would make millons in the box office.
ghostbusters 3-D
by
21 years, 8 months ago
by
21 years, 8 months ago
………… 
uh huh 
uh huh
by
21 years, 8 months ago
Well, this is just MY opinion, but I think that GB3 would make millions anyway! That's just my opinion though, you understand, you UNDERSTAND, don't ya!?
by
21 years, 8 months ago
well the prob with 3d is while its overall is cheeper, it does take longer, and knowing sony, they would want it put out asap to see if it make money and so they could make money, a live film takes usly a year or lil longer to complete while a 3d film would take up to 3 years to get done, and sony would see that as a cartoon, and after the egb idea which was sopposed to be based on gb3 (the idea and all) sony dont want to take the risk of making any gb3
by
21 years, 8 months ago
I thought he was talking 3D as in jumps out of the screen, not as in computer generated. Computer generated would take a long time (and it's not all that cheap either). And 3D, as in with the glasses, that's the cost of the movie normally, plus a supply of glasses that needs distribution (which will limit the number of theaters that will show it and how long they'll show it).
It'd be amazing, but it's not terribly feasible.
It'd be amazing, but it's not terribly feasible.
by
21 years, 8 months ago
Removed by Kingpin
by
21 years, 8 months ago
Now, now, Kingpin, that's not very nice, is it!?
by
21 years, 8 months ago
kingpin, do you have something againstme?
by
21 years, 8 months ago
Removed by Kingpin
by
21 years, 8 months ago
kingpin, i allways have ideas to share with you guys but you allways put me down. i dont know if you dont like mt just because im from hawaii or……never mind. im just trying to share the idea's i had ok.