I've been wondering if they make GB3 if it should be in 3D just ‘cause the sequel number makes it so obvious. Honestly it can’t hurt. I hope as long as its a better story than GB2 and uses the 3D without ruining GB3's story with so many special effects AKA: “Star Trek The Motion Picture”. Bill Murray seemed adamant that the effects overtook GB2. I'm not sure I agree with his thoughts from that while ago/on the spot camera interview. But as long as the 3D compliments the visual special effects and the effects don't overtake the films story, I think it'd be worth it. I'm surprised if the 3D thing is true that Sony/Columbia is going back to ILM, the group behind GB2s visual effects. I mean Sony could'a done it themselves with their Sony Digital effects dept. ILM would be just icing on the cake.