Ghostbusters: Displaced Aggression


by jay_tigran1

15 years, 1 month ago


Oh yes, a sexy party is a must!

by JamesCGamora

15 years, 1 month ago


oh hell ya…I am getting it then

by ghstbstrlmliii1

15 years, 1 month ago


How does one get an invite to this sexy party??

James, I would also recommend getting it. It is way better than TOS. IDW is going in the right direction, even if it's not quite there yet.

by doctorvenkman1

15 years, 1 month ago


GhstbstrLMLIII;154793
How does one get an invite to this sexy party??

I think the first question we should be asking is will there be females at this sexy party? Then we can ask how we get invited… lol.

by ghstbstrlmliii1

15 years, 1 month ago


Doctor Venkman;154800
I think the first question we should be asking is will there be females at this sexy party? Then we can ask how we get invited… lol.

OOO. Good call!! Guess that's what happens when you assume something…you just over the most important questions.

So did anyone ever find the “mystery cover” that was listed on ProtonCharging? I've kept my eyes open, but no luck so far.

by Swift_Justice

15 years, 1 month ago


Here's the fourth issue solicitation from IDW for December via Comics Continuum. I have a feeling this is a repost but anyhoo, here it is again if you missed it.

GHOSTBUSTERS: DISPLACED AGGRESSION #4

Written by Scott Lobdell, art by Ilias Kyriazis, covers by Kyriazis, Nick Runge.

Part 4 of 4: “A Win-Winston!” While Peter, Ray and Egon were trapped in the time stream, Winston has been waging a guerilla war against Kozar'Rai and his demonic stormtroopers. But before the four of Ghostbusters can celebrate their reunion, they need to stop Kozar'Rai from reassembling Stonehenge in the heart of Central Park! Also, a bonus 8-page back-up story starring Janine, from Ilias Kyriazis and artist Mike Dialynas!

32 pages, $3.99.

Cover:
http://www.comicscontinuum.com/stories/0909/28/ghostbusterdisplaced4.htm

by Spengs85

15 years, 1 month ago


Some of you may know this, some not, but this is Chris Ryall's (editor for IDW) blog:

Ryalltime

I've posted my reactions over at the IDW Forums, but I have a strange sense that nobody there's reading the reaction threads (a strange sense and a glimpse of the pageviews for the post).

So if you want someone at IDW to at least glance at your reactions to their Ghostbusters comics, I recommend posting them at Ryall's blog.

Of course, you have to wait until he makes a post about the Ghostbusters comic, but still, I've seen him interact extensively with the people who respond to his Transformers posts, so I know he at least reads the comments at his own blog.

Might be the only way to make our voices heard, at least those of us who have been disappointed with IDW's output (just, you know, be tactful with your criticisms).

by Spengs85

15 years, 1 month ago


So…IDW deleted a reaction thread for Displaced Aggression over at their official forums (in their IDW Projects section).

The thread only had 2 replies and all 3 reviews present in it, though negative, were articulated and tactful.

And yet…they deleted the thread because, I can only presume, the reviews were negative and they didn't want to hear it?


I'm…shocked. I expected better from a professional comics publisher. I'll continue to post my feedback there, and I won't act like a “troll” (I NEVER have on their forums, even when offering negative criticisms), but this is pretty reprehensible behavior on their part.

I wonder if they'll continue to delete reaction threads to Displaced Aggression issues if they're negative…?

by Kingpin

15 years, 1 month ago


Doctor Venkman;154712
Why was Clavet's post deleted?

He deleted it himself, but I felt it was worth keeping because there was no real reason to delete it.

Onto the review…

Let's face it, in no uncertain terms, The Other Side was a disaster. The conclusion was sloppy and trite, the art alright, but nothing to write home about, and Keith Champagne never had a grasp of the characters.

Displace Aggression #1 is definitely a marked improvement.

The artwork is definitely one of the big plus factors for IDW's second Ghostbusters miniseries, taking a slightly more stylised approach but handling it well. The Ghostbusters are displayed in a way which evokes the actors who portrayed them, but doesn't go to the point of needing likeness rights. It's especially good to see a more traditional depiction of Egon and Ray, who (whilst unmistakeable) had been given rather poor depictions by Nguyen.

The colouring is also better in my opinion. Whilst TOS was alright in terms of colour, there was no use of any form of dynamic lighting, which is used too good effect here, from the supernatural green of necto-plasmic (necto? Typo?) flame, to the deep oranges of the sunset to the sinister red of the Rudely Mallard Gang. The colouring also benefits from not being overly-detailed like a lot of comics are, giving you the vibe that this could be a new animated series.

One element in particular benefits from Illas Kyriazis: the proton streams. In this comic they crackle with energy and likewise give off a lot of illumination, it's great to see the power of the streams returned after such a wimpy depiction in the last miniseries.

As a final remark on the art side, that final panel concerning the reinforcements is nothing sort of brilliant. It really takes into account the fact these things are made of ectoplasm, and ectoplasm is slimey.

As for the story, it's so far prooving to be enjoyable. I concur with remarks about a welcome return of ‘smart’ Venkman, as the man does have his own brand of smarts even though they aren't in the same particular vein as Ray or Egon. I also felt that his exposition doesn't seem to ham-fisted, but much more forlorn.

However his character does pop in every now and then, hamming up the fact he's in the old west a treat.

There's also a nice little reference (both visual and dialogue) to the bust at the Sedgewick, which gained extra points for including the ‘cockeroach guy’.


It can't be denied, though, that Unglighter is through and through, a Mary Sue. The points have all been pointed out, and it does make you wonder for how long her character can go before possibly becoming a parody.

I'm hoping that the only reason she has these traits is because what we know about her is a lie, and that she's a demon with an alterior motive in helping the Ghostbusters. It's not a impossible plot point to conceive, and I hope it'll be true.

If it isn't, well, even being a Mary Sue she probably wouldn't go down as the worst character in Ghostbusters history.


So far, a good start. Some room for improvement, but at this current time I look forward to the other three issues.

by jay_tigran1

15 years, 1 month ago


I'm thinking they'll retcon Rachel when they fix everything…she'll go back to being Egon's prized pupil and nothing more, with no memories of being a Time Travelling Ghostbuster