Crossing the Streams
what does the OZ stand for? i dont understand

(*winston)

(*egon)

heslimedme25
isn't the ghost meant to look like it's surfing? or maybe not…nah must be crazy!

Kingpin

Sayingkingkilla
The suits look cheap as hell and I could've sworn they used the tubes from a vaccum to make the proton packs which have no lights. Not to mention one of those guys looks like Bill Nye the science guy. And the names suck too. The bald guy looks like he's been stuck in his basement a lil too long. And the logo is flat out terrible, why does the ghost have 4 fingers sticking out.

But who knows, movie magic can make any crap look decent.

Feel free to outline some constructive criticism any time, Sayingkingkilla.

Firstly, I'm having to work with the only pictures of the uniforms I can see which are the ones seen in the website banner… now the images not working in the gallery is a reasonable point… I'd recommend something like Image Shack for free image hosting. Thankfully there's a flickR account for a closer look. The suits aren't all that bad, the elbow pads and nametags aren't the same style from the films… but neither is the suit. The lack of a pistol belt and combat boots also changes it but they hardly look cheap… they feel like they're missing something but they can work… I have seen a lot worse.

The pack hoses… in the spirit of the prop builders who made the first Proton Packs for the films, it's scrounging parts that came to hand… it's not accurate but maybe they're not going for packs that are identical to the films. The few decent shots we see of the packs look incomplete, so it's not clear yet if they don't have lights… however getting light sets that do the exact same things as the films do can either be expensive or difficult to build if you don't have the know-how.

So the guy's appearance somehow doesn't live to your approval? So what if he looks like Bill Nye, the Science Guy. That's not constructive criticism, that's being overly critical. Same goes for your comment about the ‘bald guy’.

The logo is at least original and not a retrend of the ‘three finger’ logo some people are too willing to use. Plus, that's actually three fingers and a thumb… it's as anatomically correct as the original Ghostbusters logo.

As Rich said, you could learn to be a bit less critical of this film… I'd almost be tempted to ask to see how well you could do on their budget.