I have so many little gripes, it's going to sound like I didn't enjoy the book. Well, I did. I thought it was very good. I particularly liked that it was mostly Harry, Ron and Hermione doing stuff together - I think their trio one of the best elements of the earlier novels particularly, which gets just a little bit lost in the later ones.
As to the happy ending, I liked that too, perhaps not least because it was the biggest surprise in the whole book. More or less everyone I spoke to was expecting Harry to die, and I wouldn't have been surprised. Rowling is so cruel to her characters, nothing she could have done in this would have shocked me (nothing child-friendly, anyway, which the book had to be) - the only death that would have really bothered me personally would have been Hagrid (and she made us think she'd done it twice - such a tease). Oh, and Neville, I guess. In all honesty, after what's gone before, I was expecting this book to be thoroughly depressing. As it is, the ending was happy in a believable way, which came as a surprise (I said that already, didn't I?) and a relief. And it was almost completely satisfying too - but more on that in a moment.
The minor gripes. They had rather too much luck for me to find it totally convincing; as Ron points out at one stage, there's absolutely no method to their quest. Thank goodness for Snape - about whom I say, I honestly don't remember what I thought two years ago, but I don't think I ever really stopped trusting him. As I said - or implied - earlier in the post, there were no real surprises anywhere in the novel. I was expecting something that would bowl some people over - like, I dunno, Fred's evil! or something. But there was nothing like that; Fred is entirely one of the good guys, and dead now. I cared, but not as much as I probably should have. I do think she overdid the deaths a bit. I'm not saying there shouldn't be deaths, but I do think they should have impact - and by the end, so many secondary and tertiary characters had gone, it was easy to stop caring. I guess I was pretty desensitised after Dumbledore anyway.
Molly's a great lady, but I don't think she deserved something as huge as killing Bellatrix. That one should really have been Neville's. I'm glad he got to do something cool - he totally deserved it - but it will never sit right with me that Molly killed Bellatrix. I mean, why? Where's the poetic justice in that?
Tonks. Ever since Tonks was introduced, I liked her, but I always thought she was a bit pointless. Now I understand. She was only ever an incubator for Harry's godson. I found her death totally unconvincing. Yeah, ok, war going on, ultimate evil, husband (that was quick!) in mortal peril. But she was a new mother. No way would a mother ever leave her baby in those circumstances. I think that whole thing was poorly handled - and all so that it could finish up with a Wuthering Heights-esque ending: it was all screwy, but everything comes right in the younger generation.
So Harry has an orphan godson, and they have the kind of relationship he could have - should have - had with Sirius. Except we don't even get to see it! All we hear of Teddy Tonks is that he's ‘snogging Victoire’. Who? Oh… ok, she'll be Bill and Fleur's. Well, so what? We should actually see how their relationship has developed, that way it would have some impact, there would be some point to it - but they've got so many children now, there wasn't room. If I were Ginny - I never was remotely interested in their relationship, but anyway, if I were her - I would have insisted on calling my second son Fred rather than Albus. I mean, Harry gets a James and a Lily…
Speaking of all those Weasleys, this attitude they have to horrific injury: well, I've only been hideously maimed, never mind… Admirable, but they get there so quickly, I do find it hard to believe.
But they're all such little gripes. So little. I've always said JK's greatest talent is suspence and making us want to read on, and this book does this as well as the others. I shall end on something positive. The Sorting system, which I have never approved of, is pretty much undermined. The characters acknowledge that being in Slytherin doesn't necessarily mean you're evil, which I think will help cut down the Dark Wizard and Witch turnout: I'm sure that at least half of the children who grow up to be evil only go that way because putting them in Slytherin is as good as saying, sorry but you're going to be an evil, evil person. So, yeah, I'm glad that was resolved.