If there's a thread on this already – I appologise in advance. I did a quick search, and didn't find anything.
Anyways – I've noticed quite a few people here have 15-20 line signatures, which, to me at least, is quite extreme. Why should a signature be longer than the content of the average member's post? Another board where I spend most of my time – our rules are that you can have no more than 3 lines in a signature. While that works for that site(and I personally like it that way), that's probably too little of space for you all here. How about a nice medium – around 6 lines max?
As it is, we can view 15-16 posts per thread – and when 60% of the text on a single page is because of people's signatures – that's just not right. It just clutters up the topic at hand. While I know quite a few of you wouldn't like this – don't we want GBN to be easier to navigate, look better, and to load faster? I certainly do. I'm not sure if we should have an official rule here about it, but, i do hope some people will take this into consideration
Allright, I'll get off my soapbox for now.