Is there any reason why you think Ghostbusters 3 SHOULDN'T be made???


by Zack

22 years, 7 months ago


plus almost no the same actors between the 2 trilogies except for I think Anthony Daniels and Kenny Baker maybe Frank Oz too smile

Zack

by Prince2002

22 years, 7 months ago


It would be nice if GB3 were to be made, but I think personally it wouldn't get the appeal of many because the many that go to movies now are the teenie boppers. Plus I don't really see anyone that could play an exceptional new Ghostbuster(s) if they decide to recruit. That is another problem Columbia at the beginning decided from what Dan Akroyd said on Entertainment tonight in 1999 or 1998 that the budget that they would be recieving would not be enough for the things he wanted and to pay cameo's and new upcoming actor's(Will smith). Plus the script was turned down by Columbia and they gave the original budget Ghostbusters 3 would have recieved to greenlight Blair Witch 2 and 3. So the movie would have been made if the budget was increased and the script finished. Also some of the people from the original production decided to leave the GB franchise alone, because they thought it would of been killed. At one time it was said in a magazine that Conan O'brien was working with Dan Akroyd on a new Script. But that was just a rumor. But the Good news is that who nows what can happen in the future. We got a lot of movies from past making a come back and will be making a lot of money: Indiana Jones 4, Terminator 3, Goonies 2, Die Hard 4, and Bad Boys 2. Columbia will change their minds as soon as they open eyes.

Peace…

prince131999@yahoo.com

by deadderek

22 years, 7 months ago


GB1 was great. GB2 ok. GB3 who knows?
If GB3 is made,it better be a damn good movie!

by dave_15

22 years, 7 months ago


As long as gb3 has a good script and storyline I don't care if they use flashlights as the proton streams or white sheets as the ghosts.

by DctrPeteVenkman

22 years, 7 months ago


Not to change the subject, but with the onslaught of sequels in production….I wouldn't be surprised with a 20yr ann. being GB3.

by Jay_Tigran

22 years, 7 months ago


in response to what Dave said:

I used ta do that when I was a kid…*L*

by dave_15

22 years, 7 months ago


If you never did that when you were young you weren't one of the cool kids. I needed to do something before I got the actual toy proton pack.

by RentonGb

22 years, 7 months ago


It could suck beyond belief and totaly ruin Ghostbusters.

by doncroswhite

22 years, 7 months ago


If there could be any way to get a real good story, that would the only way to make the third movie good. Special effects are used to help tell the story, a movie should not be based on them.
I think the best triology was Back to the Future.

by Slimer07

22 years, 7 months ago


One reason I could think of(and not that important) is cosmetic.

Think about it, its been a 12 yeargap between the last movie and now, Harold and Dan arent exactly how they used to look. I'm just scared it would turnm into a Space Cowboys, a bunch of old fat gray haired men chasing ghosts.

And about regaining public intrest in GB.

I'd say re-release GBI and GBII together, about 6 months before GBIII came out, renewing old fnas' intrests and gaining new fans as well.