The signs you mention are OK but way too optimistic.
-9sam1 I believe said that the GB3 sneak peek was just a dream. So I can't see that as being so viable to be happy about.
-Ghost Trek sure has bad spelling. If he “was” Dan Ackroyd I think his spelling would be flawless.
-Weren't the petitions started by you as of late?
-www.ghostbusters3.com has been around for 3 years. When GB3 was seriously a possibility Sony bought the URL. But the most curious thing is whenever you get in there the address goes so far as to end with “start.html”. I never noticed that before back in the earlier days of that address.
Then
www.ghostbusters.com site was for the 1999 release of the DVD's.
-Yes the proton pack is a curiousity with no explanation.
One that hasn't been mentioned is the morning talk show in late May that had Bill Murray and Ernie Hudson. A pack and Ecto-1 were used in the article. Why have this article made about an old movie?
Then the recent old movies getting late sequels: T3, Indy Jones 4.
Sooner or later Sony's gonna have to compete with their own old property.