Murray: Live or Ghost


by evennflow

22 years, 1 month ago

Would you rather see Murray as ghost and give a new blood of Ghostbusters or as a living Ghostbuster to woop some candy butt on the paranormal?

Personally I would rather see him as the Ghostbuster he was back in the day.

by DctrPeteVenkman

22 years, 1 month ago

Hell…I'd be happy if they made Ghostbusters 3. Dead or alive.

by Ghostbuster_D

22 years, 1 month ago

I'm not sure. I guess it depends. If he was gonna become evil, then no. If he was gonna become casper, then no. If he was gonna be kinda helpful, then yes, but only if they could come up with a really good story.

by GhostbusterN

22 years, 1 month ago

It'd suck if Murray became a ghost! How could they make a plot about that? But, as DctrPeteVenkman put it, “Hell…I'd be happy if they made Ghostbusters 3. Dead or alive.”

by mrpecker1

22 years, 1 month ago

Youve got to remember…Aykroyd's original GB1 script sucked. Ramis made it the great story that it is. And if im not mistaken, that review that staxx did, is a review of a script written only by Dan…..it hasnt been revised by Harold yet.

by LordVego

22 years, 1 month ago

i agree with dctrpetevenkman, as long as its made man…as long as its made

by NxtGhostbuster

22 years ago

He should live to bust ghosts.

by drugasbuster

22 years ago

live