sg1star
“chadlnx: Vinz, Bo, and company need to leave.
chadlnx: No questions asked.”
Just as an aside…Bo was the one that started one of the threads that was deleted for “legal reasons”. One of the things that was said in Chad's replacement post was a direct contradiction to something Bo had stated in HIS post. Isn't it possible that someone stepped on some toes that they shouldn't have stepped on? Chad's already said that he can't get into the reasons behind whatever may be happening legally…couldn't “no questions asked” just mean that he couldn't talk about WHY they needed to go? We all know about Chad and Bo's problems in the past, if it was just a personality conflict, which Chad's not been shy about owning up to before, why wouldn't he just say so?