by
16 years, 2 months ago
by
16 years, 2 months ago
by
16 years, 2 months ago
by
16 years, 2 months ago
Matthew;128340
The first thing to say about this is that Ghostbusters III has not been confirmed. Columbia Pictures have simply hired two writers to write a script for it. Columbia are simply considering a sequel and looking into how it could work and what the possibilities are. If the writers that they have hired manage to come up with an exceptional script then Columbia will probably take the next step and try to sign Ramis, Aykroyd, Hudson, Potts and last but certainly not least, Murray.
Signing Ramis, Aykroyd, Hudson and Potts will not be a problem for Columbia pictures. In fact, they've wanted to make a third Ghostbusters movie for years. The problem, as most people are aware, is Murray. Murray has said in the past that he does not like making sequels (even if he voiced the lasagne loving cat again in the sequel to Garfield). Murray was also probably disappointed at how Ghostbusters II turned and doesn't want to take the risk at making the same mistake twice. He has also said in the past that he only works on things that he know's he's going to enjoy doing. So, in other words, Murray is a difficult man to get hold of. Columbia Pictures are well aware of this spanner in the works and they have obviously had the sensible notion that if they approach Murray with an impressive script then he's far more likely to agree on making Ghostbusters III.
I just hope the writers do a good job. It's almost universally agreed that we do not want to see a new team of Ghostbusters. We want to see the original actors come back as the stars of the film. Dr Egon Spengler, Dr Ray Stanz, Dr Peter Venkman and Winston Zeddmore. We do not want to see them working alongside or playing second fiddle to a new group of characters. Many people have said that Murray, Aykroyd, Hudon and Ramis are too old and in particular that Ramis is now too fat to star in another sequel. All I can say to that is that you can never be too old or too fat for comedy. In fact, the older the better and the fatter the better! It will only add to the laughs. This IS a comedy after all not a beauty pageant.
I hope that the writers come up with something imaginative and original for Ghostbusters III since Ghostbusters II was almost scene for scene a weak copycat of the original. If they can engineer a script which is totally original and funny then this movie will be good. Just how good it will be is anyones guess.
The movie also needs to leave certain things well alone. Firstly the title. Call it Ghostbusters III. Plain and simple. No extra titles attached to it thankyou very much. I don't want to see “Ghostbusters III: Back in business” or anything like that. Just call it Ghostbusters III. Nice and simple!
Next, the logo. Do not touch this under any circumstances! You just don't mess with perfection. After some research done by Terminal Reality (the makers of the upcoming video game) the Ghostbusters no ghost logo was recently recognised as the second most recognisable logo in the world, the first being Coca Cola. The Ghostbusters do not need to change the no ghost logo. It was pointlessly changed for Ghostbusters II which was in my opinion sacrilege!
The third thing they must do is bring back Elmer Bernsteins score from the original movie. It is a truly fantastic score and is probably one of the most underrated scores of all time. Bring it back and employ an experienced composer to rework it for the new movie.
The movie also has the most catchy theme tune ever written. Ray Parker Juniors Ghostbusters theme is a masterpeice! I'd like to see him rework it (only slightly) so that it sounds up to date and I'd also like to see it released it the charts to coincide with the release of the movie.
The Ghostbusters firehouse, the Ecto, jumpsuits and ghost catching equipment from the original all need to be in there which gos without saying.
Another thing to say is that Ghostbusters III must not rely on cgi to try to sell itself. It's all about the characters and the story, the jargon filled dialogue and the funny wisecracks. Personally I'd like to see the kind of special effects which mix puppetry with computer generated effects. I think it looks better and it will make the movie feel like more of a genuine sequel.
If Ghostbusters III has all these ingedients included, if it stars the original cast and a good script is written for it then I have no doubt that it will be both a commercial hit and more importantly a movie which is liked by critics and fans alike.
by
16 years, 2 months ago
by
16 years, 2 months ago
by
16 years, 2 months ago
by
16 years, 2 months ago
by
16 years, 2 months ago
by
16 years, 2 months ago
Kingpin;128375
If this thing goes anyway, like bigpal mentioned, I want the comedy to be intelligent.
The special effects of potential fulm could be fantastic, but if I see bodily function gags, drug jokes or over-the-top profanity just because they can get away with it, then sorry, but this is the wrong direction to take it in.
This type of ‘comedy’ is going to be dated in five years whereas the comedy of the existing films still remains fresh and relevant today, and I don't want to see my beloved franchise's style of wit and humor go the way of Epic Movie and Disaster Movie.