Well. I guess we can end this debate now:

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/06/ghostbusters-graphically-youll-want-to-stick-with-the-360.ars

For fucking shame, Terminal Reality. You guys keep digging a deeper hole for everytime you speak.

Oh well. Like I said, it's a bday gift. If it wasn't, there's no way I'd spend $60 plus tax on a half assed version.

hi new but not so new, been visiting this site every day for the past 2 years. i like alot of people are upset at the diference between the xbox and ps3 graphics. my roomate has the 360 version and i have the ps3, without even looking at all the hype about this on the internet we both noticed the diference with the proton stream scaring. that alone bothers me not to mention the missing or blured detail in the ps3. we just started both games up on both systems and fliped back and forth with our switch and their really is a difference.
i just finished writing to atari i dont expect that will do much but at least i can say i tried.
hope their is a patch, im sick of allwase getting the shaft with the ps3 just absolutly sick of it!

peace out.

http://www.vg247.com/2008/04/28/sierra-spring-break-08-ps3-exclusivity-would-have-allowed-double-the-amount-of-objects-on-screen-says-ghostbusters-dev/

After everything that was said makes the ps3 version seem even more disappointing

Poor show terminal reality.

I have a PS3 and it looks great. I would never even have suspected lower quality if it wasn't for all these 360 fanboys hyping this so much. Not gonna let a slightly less quality ruin the experience I've waited 2 years for.

TimTheTerrorDog;148178
I have a PS3 and it looks great. I would never even have suspected lower quality if it wasn't for all these 360 fanboys hyping this so much. Not gonna let a slightly less quality ruin the experience I've waited 2 years for.

thank you tim, glad to hear a voice of reason amongst the PS3ers thinking they got shafted.

Skanker has explained why this happens on multiple occasions. And it's not THAT big of a deal.

Does the “less quality” hinder the gameplay?

Didn't think so.

God, I remember a day when gameplay scored higher on priorities over how pretty the game was.

It looks GREAT! to me. The only times you really notice anything is, when there are close-ups, but even then, it's not a big deal.

It is very easy to criticize something and pick it apart. I think we need to take a breather and learn to appreciate what Terminal Reality has done for us.

Specs are specs. If another version of the game suits you, go for it. There is no sense in nitpicking it to death. I'm going to lock this thread.

All I can say is that I'm just basically conveying information to everyone here. I thought it would be nice to shed some light on what the issues could have been. I didn't intentionally lie to anyone.

That being said, I'm also not in the position to carry out this converstaion any further. That is not my job.

Thank you for your time.