Currently the production is dead and there's no truth to the first statement made…

Are you kidding you can't do gb3 without murray its just like doing star wars without mark hamill this guy needs to quit making crap up. Venkman has got to be in it otherwise it is pointless

Err…despite how poor Episodes I, II and III may or may not have turned out, they seemed to fair okayish without Mark Hamill.

Don't get me wrong, Mark's been superb as the Joker, as well as many of his other vocal roles, but to say the success of Star Wars was on his shoulders alone is rediculous, it's a group effort.

And on that thought, Ghostbusters would not be pointless without Bill Murray, sure, it wouldn't be the same, but he is, when you put it on paper, still just an actor.

WHY DONT THEY JUST CHANGE THE SCRIPT SAYING DR. VENKMAN DIED OR SUMTHING……