by
13 years, 7 months ago
by
13 years, 7 months ago
by
13 years, 7 months ago
by
13 years, 7 months ago
by
13 years, 7 months ago
BigMac;170127
The art on the covers is that made me think these books were about a generic Ghostbusters team, mainly due to the appearance of the no ghosts logos. I don't know if they're illustrated, but they're listed under the “fantasy for children” section. As children books, I'm guessing that they're going to be illustrated.
by
13 years, 7 months ago
Doc Fritz;170128
My personal guess is that these are…shall we say…unauthorized. I mean, I'm not an expert on Russian children's books or licensing laws, but while one cover does feature semi-recognizable renderings of (animated) Ray and Venkman, the lack of the authentic Ghostbuster logo or title font or anything of the sort screams “Bootleg” to me.
That's not to say it might not be an interesting get though. Bootlegs can be fun.
by
13 years, 7 months ago
by
13 years, 7 months ago
Nix;170138Did you get that from Family Guy? I never understood that joke. I first thought it was a joke about the language's grammar, but that doesn't make any sense.
Remember though: In Mother Russia, GHOST BUSTS YOU!
by
13 years, 7 months ago
by
13 years, 7 months ago