Haha, I know. It's so tough, because I'm there “technically” as a professional, so I can't exactly just have someone snap a photo of me with him. It was still just cool getting to meet him though. Seemed like a really good guy, and a HUGE fan of movies all around.
About the blu-ray:
In all honesty, the quality wasn't that much better, but it was noticeable. Does that necessarily increase my enjoyment of the film? Not really.
Still, I'm sure I'll pick it up anyways, if only for the special features. Besides, if there's one film I'm going to own on VHS, DVD, and Blu-Ray, it might as well be Ghostbusters.
Here's what I wrote about the blu-ray in the article:
"After watching Ghostbusters several times over the last couple months on regular DVD, I am convinced that on Blu-ray the film has never looked, or sounded, better. Granted, I did get to experience this upcoming release on a theater-sized screen with a great sound system. Still, the vast improvement in the picture and sound quality was readily apparent. I found this very surprising, as the film is twenty-five years old, and Ive often said that theres no point in re-buying an old film on Blu-ray if you already own it on DVD. However, I am now convinced that with the right amount of effort applied to the transfer, even older films can look and sound better in the Blu-ray format. Big props to Sony for putting in the effort to make this a great release."