have you seen turtles forever
in that made-for-tv movie
it had 2003 TMNT meet 1987 TMNT
that would be the prefect plot for the ghost busters
all four of them
the 1976 filmation's ghostbusters meeting the 1984(supposed)real ghostbusters
the plot could be about the 1986 filmation's meeting the 1997 extreme ghostbusters
as both are about the next generation taking the mante of ghostfighting

unity
have you seen turtles forever
in that made-for-tv movie
it had 2003 TMNT meet 1987 TMNT
that would be the prefect plot for the ghost busters
all four of them
the 1976 filmation's ghostbusters meeting the 1984(supposed)real ghostbusters
the plot could be about the 1986 filmation's meeting the 1997 extreme ghostbusters
as both are about the next generation taking the mante of ghostfighting

why have you posted the same thread twice?

This is a fan project, which you all ready have a post in Fan Projects about this

Don't double post

unity;166499
the 1984(supposed)real ghostbusters

There's no “supposed” about it, the Columbia Ghostbusters are the real Ghostbusters.

1.I meant supposed as the fact that it's a cartoon
the real ghostbusters are the live action one(how can the cartoon be the real ghostbusters if it's a cartoon?)

2. Columbia bought the rights of title from filmation,& filmation sold
the rights of the title to Columbia

3.when Columbia Pictures released the film Ghostbusters in 1984 it
neglected the fact that Filmation had already produced a live-action
comedy series with that same name in 1975.

Columbia Pictures property could not simply be called Ghostbusters.
Columbia then proceeded to name their cartoon show The Real Ghostbusters to directly distinguish it from the Filmation show.

Filmation's Lou Scheimer later admitted "We should have asked for the
animation rights for their
(Columbia's) Ghostbusters

finally, I didn't think the first one made it through

I think for a greater good, I feel that if both ghostbusters meet each
other it would have to end in respect for each other over the fact
that both fight evil because it's the right thing to do

Um, it sounds like you're trying to clarify a few things that were misunderstood in another thread, in which case, you should have posted this in that thread, not created a whole new one where people won't be able to read the prior part of the conversation.

Combined all three topics, it makes it clearer what on earth the point is, but probably doesn't make any more worthwhile.