devilmanozzy;161197
I wont even waste my time with such a unsound argument. You even after quoting what I said miss understood me. I didn't have MTV when I was growing up. I didn't even have cable till 2005.
“A Lot of Us” doesn't have to mean the person that actually made the comment, it means that a majority of people I knew unlike you had watched to a degree MTV to the point that they felt that everything should be fast paced like it. This has been a general argument for years about the changes in pacing in industry media such as TV, Movies and other forms of entertainment.
Unfortunately for you, “us”
does mean the person typing the statement is including themselves. “Us” is the objective case of we. I highly doubt you'd be saying “We grew up with MTV” and be intending to not include yourself. If you didn't mean to include yourself, then that's fine, but don't act like I was supposed to infer from “us” that you meant “the majority of people you knew had watched MTV to the point that they felt that everything should be fast paced like it,” because that's simply not being truthful.
And your point about a general argument for years about the changes in pacing in industry media being made because of a generation that grew up with MTV and likes things fast paced does not mean that movies that are considered classics are no longer good movies because of their lack of pandering to an ADD obsessed generation. Wanting things to be fast paced is not looked upon by the majority of people. Its frowned upon, due to the lack of respect for the art form. That's like saying Michaelangelo's David isn't worth your time because he took too long to sculpt it and it doesn't have flashing lights. Its an art form, in all respects. Criticizing a movie soley based on its pacing “not fitting in with the MTV crowd” isn't going to prove much.