Mr-Stay-Puft;149773
Your wrong because a 5 is perfect and a 4 is just one score below a 5 where as A 8 is two scores below a 10. And I also agree with superstarseven that there was no need to bash gb2 because i love gb2 and think It was a perfect movie.
Mr-Stay-Puft;149779
I don't take it personal but it's just that people buy games with high reviews and to some a 8 is not worth shelling out 60 bucks for which hurts the game for creating a part2. The fact that it got a 8 was a shock because I know reviewers love bashing good games and franchises. I thought for sure this game was getting a negative review on x play. Happy it didn't.
Woooooow. Arguing that 4/5 and 8/10 are
not the same thing… wow. 80% is 80%. Next you'll be telling people that an 80/10 is worse than a 8/10 (since that is supposedly worse than a 4/5) because an 8/10 is two scores below perfect, while an 80/100 is 20 scores below perfect. Geez…
Seriously dude… 4 divided by 5 is 80%, 8 divided by 10 is 80%, 80 divided by 100 is 80%. They're all the same score. Just because you base a score on a smaller scale (out of 5 instead of out of 10), does not make the rating any different.
Its a fantastic game that has gotten great reviews. An 8/10 is not a bad review, so I don't know why you seem to think it is (especially when you think the identical 4/5 is a great review). The fact that you also claim the 8 is a shock is odd considering you also claim that reviews love to bash good games and franchises, which obviously this is, so if you know they love to bash then you shouldn't be so shocked.
Stop worrying about reviews. You like the game. We all like the game. That's all that matters. Its selling incredibly well, despite the “bad” (also referred to as “good” or “80%”) ratings.
(And yes… “bad” was sarcastic).